Greetings, friends!
Clarity is overrated, in all walks of life—including politics and business. In our relentless pursuit of black-and-white answers, we miss the nuances that drive human behavior. The world is a patchwork of complexities, not a series of sharp edges. As photographer Robert Capa famously noted, "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough." Sometimes, getting closer means embracing the blur—the ambiguity where the real stories unfold and where true understanding begins.
Nature is full of blurred moments — a hummingbird's wings, a rushing waterfall, or the soft focus of your lover’s toothy half-smile. These instances of natural blur often evoke a sense of movement, mystery, or tranquility.
As John Ruskin, the art critic, observed: "There is no such thing as a good painting of nature; there are good paintings of what people see in nature." And what we see is often a blend of crisp details and gentle blurs.
In photography, blur has been both an unavoidable limitation and a creative tool. Early photographers like Julia Margaret Cameron embraced the softness of long exposures, creating dreamy portraits that seemed to capture the essence of their subjects rather than just their appearance.
Modern photographers continue to use blur creatively. For instance, Hiroshi Sugimoto's seascape series presents long-exposure shots of the ocean and sky, reducing them to abstract bands of tone that blur the line between reality and imagination.
Painters have long understood the power of blur. Leonardo da Vinci's sfumato technique, which softens outlines and transitions between colors, gave his paintings an almost ethereal quality. He believed that "Art is never finished, only abandoned," perhaps acknowledging the blurred line between completion and process.
Gerhard Richter has made blur a central aspect of his work. His large-scale blurred photorealistic paintings challenge our perception and memory, creating a sense of uncertainty and movement within static images.
Filmmakers use blur to guide the viewer's attention, create mood, or represent subjective experiences. Alfred Hitchcock, master of suspense, often used blur to heighten tension or disorientation. In "Vertigo," blurred point-of-view shots emphasize the protagonist's fear and confusion.
More recently, in "The Revenant," Emmanuel Lubezki used natural light and shallow depth of field to create a visceral, dream-like atmosphere that blurs the line between the physical and spiritual worlds.
The legendary filmmaker Akira Kurosawa once said, "In all my films, there's three or maybe four minutes of real cinema." Perhaps he was referring to those transcendent moments when the boundaries between the viewer and the viewed become beautifully blurred.
Blur, whether in nature or art, invites us to look beyond the obvious, to engage our imagination, and to embrace the poetry of the indistinct. The photographer William Klein said it best, "I have always done the opposite of what I was trained to do... I'm always trying to get out of focus."
In a world obsessed with high definition and perfect clarity, perhaps we need to reconsider the value of blur. It reminds us that not everything needs to be sharply defined to be beautiful or meaningful. Sometimes, it's in the soft edges and hazy outlines that we find the most profound truths and the most moving beauty.
Thanks for reading and being a subscriber.
‘Till next time.
ak
I've had the very same thoughts just this week.
Blur is the more natural state of things. Things are blurry before they are clear. And in our dealing with things, we rush to make things artificially clear...which creates a blur that would not exist if we would simply deal with the more natural blur in the first place.
Love this!
Well said. This is how we see. Nicely done.