Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Glenn Gers's avatar

I think if you're an instructor at a school which teaches a particular form or style, and the student signed on to that school, then you're both required to do your best to work in that form or style - while working on projects for/within that school. If coming out of that program signifies you have learned a specific thing, then you're both obligated to do your best with that. But otherwise: I think an art teacher's job is to encourage and inform an artist so that they can do what they want to do. Certainly tell the artist your fears or alternatives or objections - but then try to see what they are doing, and help them do it. Because: who knows? There are as many different types of art as there are artists. Or maybe it's flawed -- but the flaws are outweighed by some other magic. That happens a lot. Hopefully your observations will percolate in them and come out as their own particular brew, and you will have helped that be stronger and more delicious. Making your own mistakes may actually be the definition of art.

Expand full comment
Right Twice a Day's avatar

The only time I felt I'd done any good as a teacher was when working with mothers on welfare at the Humboldt Park Employment Training Center in Chicago. I found my actual teaching talent was provoking people I could tell were smart (but didn't seem to think so) into realizing it. These were women, many of whom had been persuaded that they were worthless as far as thinking and learning went. My involuntary skill was to either spark their interest and nurture it, or make them so bored and frustrated with my own interests that they rebelled and demanded alternatives. I would not say teaching is my strong suit, but under certain rare circumstances I instigated some unexpected positive results.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts